- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:28:55 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > Le 26/08/2013 07:58, Cameron McCormack a écrit : >> <bad-string> and <bad-url> tokens are disallowed in <any-value>, which >> is used as the value for custom properties and also as the fallback for >> variable references. But they are not disallowed at the top level of a >> non-custom property that has variable references (and thus invokes the >> "property value containing a variable must be assumed to be valid at >> parse time" requirement). So: >> >> @supports (color: var(a, " >> )) { ... fails ... } >> @supports (color: var(a, url("b" c)) { ... fails ... } >> @supports (var-a: " >> ) { ... fails ... } >> @supports (var-a: url("b" c)) { ... fails ... } >> >> But: >> >> @supports (color: var(a) " >> ) { ... succeeds ... } >> @supports (color: var(a) url("b" c)) { ... succeeds ... } >> >> Should we make these fail too? >> > > Ah, interesting case. IMO we should change css-variables to make this > invalid in all contexts (not just @supports.) That is: > > Declarations with variables references do not have their value checked > against the grammar of the property at parse time. Instead (this is the new > part) the value must match <any-value>. Yeah, this seems reasonable to me. We don't want to spread computed-time-invalid further than necessary if we really can tell that something is invalid at parse time. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 16:29:41 UTC