- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:14:48 +0200
- To: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:27:44 +0200, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it would be weird and ugly if the outline did not transform in > 3d too, whether it was being used as a purely decorative effect or to > show focusing. Why should the outline look bizarrely out of place and > buggy if I were to tilt the rest of my interface down into a 3d plane? > What if I had a very long form tilted into something like the Star Wars > opening scroll, with each focus bringing the input close and sending > everything above it further away? Presto's approach would just look like > a mistake in that case, and I'd probably need to resort to something > else to indicate focus (like box shadow). Well, I can see your point of the containing element of the outlined element is transformed, then having the outline match the context may make sense. On the other hand, I am much less convinced about the outline of a transformed element in a non transformed container. - Florian
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 17:15:14 UTC