- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:04:08 -0700
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On 8/19/13 12:45 PM, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: >IDPF appears to be specifying a EPUB-specific technology subset prefix >using the syntax for the CSS vendor prefix. This strikes me as both >problematic (precludes vendor prefixing with this) as well as unnecessary >(why not just use the unprefixed properties), but perhaps I'm >misunderstanding something. > > • -epub-speak > • -epub-speak-as >… > • -epub-text-align-last > • -epub-text-emphasis > • -epub-text-emphasis-color > • -epub-text-emphasis-style > • -epub-word-break > >http://www.idpf.org/epub/30/spec/epub30-contentdocs.html#sec-css-voice-cha >racteristics >http://www.idpf.org/epub/30/spec/epub30-contentdocs.html#sec-css-text > >Could someone please explain whether this is a valid use of the vendor >prefix pattern? If it's not, the CSS WG chair should probably reach out >to the IDPF and EPUB groups. If this *is* a valid use CSS vendor >prefixes, are there any known implementations? My understanding is that this is in fact necessary because EPUB releases may depend on specific CSS *drafts*; thus until EPUB version N depends on a REC for a given feature it uses -epub-.
Received on Monday, 19 August 2013 23:04:51 UTC