- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:43:32 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:02 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > One particular custom suggestion jumped out at me as an interesting > possibility: a :drop([active | valid | invalid]) function pseudoclass. > This not only puts the "drop" part first, which was called out as a > good thing in several of the feedback entries, it also gives a natural > extension point. > > So, I suggest we make a final decision for this at next week's call, > and choose between: > > 1. :current-drop / :valid-drop / :invalid-drop > 2. :active-drop / :valid-drop / :invalid-drop > 3. :drop(active) / :drop(valid) / :drop(invalid) You don't really need the parentheses in order to get the common word first, nor to make it extendable. You could just have: :drop-active / :drop-valid / :drop-invalid / :drop-whatever I'm not a big fan of parentheses in pseudo-classes, and they really aren't needed here.
Received on Sunday, 18 August 2013 04:44:01 UTC