Re: CSS properties for snapping during scrolling

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:

> To me, it seems that paged overflow is a subset of the MS proposal. In
> paged overflow, one would write:
>
>   .container {
>     overflow: paged-x;
>   }
>
> while in the MS proposal you would write:
>
>   .container {
>     overflow-x: auto;
>     overflow-y: hidden;
>     -ms-scroll-snap-type: mandatory;
>     -ms-scroll-snap-points-x: snapInterval(0%, 100%);
>   }
>
> So I don't understand why it's more work to do paged overflow.
>

Because pagination affects layout of the container's descendants --- they
have to be paginated! Your two examples could lead to completely different
layouts of the content.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*