- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:08:14 -0700
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Peter Sloetjes <pjs.nl@live.com>
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 21:08:41 UTC
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:04:32 +0200, Peter Sloetjes <pjs.nl@live.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:54:47 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> >> wrote: >> >> Could CSS custom filters be used to address this use case? >>> >> >> Clearly there are more color domains than rgba. Transforms in those >> domains do require custom implementations, because they normally are >> nonlinear in the rgba-domain. >> > > I don't know enough about CSS custom filters to tell if it's feasible for > these use cases or not. Custom filters can't access the color information of the content that they're applied on so they can't be used. I can't tell what problem Peter is trying to solve with the color transformation. > > > Other use cases do not involve graphics at all, such as custom >> transformations of font sizes. >> > > Is IE's 'zoom' property inadequate for this use case? > > > My request is basically to remove the built-in inefficiency at this very >> low level of the specification. >> > > Yes, I understand that. I just need to know what the use cases are and see > whether there are other solutions that address those use cases *better*. > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 21:08:41 UTC