W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2013

Re: [CSS21] Reviews and tests needed for errata: s.6.2.1(change)

From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:29:43 -0700
To: "www-style@gtalbot.org" <www-style@gtalbot.org>
CC: www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE1FF6F8.3A44C%rhauck@adobe.com>
Gérard,


Thanks very much for your input on these. I've updated the wiki with your
feedback.

Cheers,
-Rebecca

On 7/31/13 10:12 AM, ""Gérard Talbot"" <www-style@gtalbot.org> wrote:

>
>Le Mer 31 juillet 2013 12:49, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit :
>>
>> Le Mar 30 juillet 2013 19:08, Rebecca Hauck a écrit :
>>
>>>>> Let me know if I missed anything or if you have questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -Rebecca
>>
>> Errata in REC-CSS2-20110607
>> http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html
>>
>>
>> CSS 2.1 Errata wikipage
>> http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata
>>
>>
>>
>> s.6.1.1(clarification) and s.6.2.1(change) (which both relate to
>>'inherit'
>> keyword):
>>
>> I would make sure that these 3 tests with the "Submitted for Review"
>> status are reviewed and approved:
>>
>
>[shepherd]
>http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/inherit-static-offset-001/
>
>[shepherd]
>http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/inherit-static-offset-002/
>
>[shepherd]
>http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/inherit-static-offset-003/
>
>
>[nightly-unstable]
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/inherit-static-
>offset-001.htm
>
>[nightly-unstable]
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/inherit-static-
>offset-002.htm
>
>[nightly-unstable]
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/inherit-static-
>offset-003.htm
>
>
>
>> The wording of the text asserts of those 3 tests has to be checked.
>>
>> Those 3 tests were created in response to
>> [CSS21] Computed value of top/right/bottom/left for position:static
>> 
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Nov/0014.htm
>>l
>
>
>Yes, there was some discussion about the change in s.6.2.1:
>
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2011Mar/0022.html
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2012Apr/0012.html
>
>After the CSSWG discussion, the following 2 tests have to be revisited and
>re-approved, I guess:
>
>[shepherd]
>http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/dynamic-top-change-002/
>
>[RC6]
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/dynamic-top-change-002.
>htm
>
>[nightly-unstable]
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/dynamic-top-cha
>nge-002.htm
>
>
>[shepherd]
>http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/dynamic-top-change-003/
>
>[RC6]
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/dynamic-top-change-003.
>htm
>
>[nightly-unstable]
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/dynamic-top-cha
>nge-003.htm
>
>The computed value which is inherited for 'position: static' elements is
>no longer 'auto' (as written in the past in the spec) but the specified
>values (now).
>
>Simple test:
><div id="parent" style="position: static; top: 50px; left: 100px;">
>  <div id="child" style="position: relative; top: inherit; left:
>inherit;">
></div>
>
>and the child will be offset toward the bottom by 50px and toward the
>right by 100px.
>
>Gérard
>
>
>>> I suppose those outstanding issues have yet to go through the
>>>discussion
>>> and proposal process as the items listed in the errata did.  This
>>> exercise
>>> is about mapping tests to those items already agreed upon in the
>>>errata,
>>> not necessarily for adding new items.  That said though, the other
>>> action
>>> item related to this was for Anton and fantasai to review the errata
>>> [1],
>>> so they may also take these things into consideration.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/570
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html
>>
>> Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite
>> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
>>
>> Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite
>> 
>>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-cont
>>ributions-css21-testsuite.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html
>
>Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite
>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
>
>Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite
>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contr
>ibutions-css21-testsuite.html
>
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 18:28:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC