- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:30:30 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: >> Combining these two makes me think that, in turn, if cells are to be >> pseudo-stacking contexts, then either: >> (a) the backgrounds of all of the table parts except for the table >> (i.e., column groups, columns, row groups, rows, and cells) >> should be part of background layer in the pseudo-stacking >> context established by the cell, or >> (b) none of the backgrounds (not even the cell's) should be part of >> the pseudo-stacking context established by the cell. > > fantasai and I are fine with option (b). It's kinda crazy, but tables > are kinda crazy anyway, and we agree that it's the least crazy of the > options, especially from an author's perspective. fantasai also just pointed out that collapsed borders are crazy, and we should probably paint all of table backgrounds/border in one layer belonging to the table box. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 18:31:18 UTC