- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:28:37 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > Combining these two makes me think that, in turn, if cells are to be > pseudo-stacking contexts, then either: > (a) the backgrounds of all of the table parts except for the table > (i.e., column groups, columns, row groups, rows, and cells) > should be part of background layer in the pseudo-stacking > context established by the cell, or > (b) none of the backgrounds (not even the cell's) should be part of > the pseudo-stacking context established by the cell. fantasai and I are fine with option (b). It's kinda crazy, but tables are kinda crazy anyway, and we agree that it's the least crazy of the options, especially from an author's perspective. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 18:29:23 UTC