- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:56:52 +0200
- To: www-style@gtalbot.org
- CC: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 11/04/2013 00:06, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit : >> You can talk about the initial value of background-clip >> as "the default", but it’s really paraphrasing what’s already defined. > Where exactly do you see "background-clip" in the following image or flash > object? > > Where exactly do you see "background painting area" in the following image > or flash object? > > http://www.hicksdesign.co.uk/journal/3d-css-box-model > > http://www.redmelon.net/tstme/box_model/ Well, that’s kind of my point: The image and flash object are incomplete for UAs that support css3-background. In CSS 2.1, the background painting area (although the concept is not named) is always the border area of a box. This is what (among other things) the image of flash object describe. css3-background normatively and unambiguously redefines the concept. I still think it’s redundant, but would it address your concern to add a note like this in the definition of background-clip? > Note: there is no 'margin-box' value. The background painting area > never extends into the margins. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:57:15 UTC