- From: Ketan Singh <singh.ketan7@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:05:35 +0530
- To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
> A personal attack from jQuery developer (as you are)? Pride shuns > criticism in the dialectic of creating "problems" with purported > solutions, side effects be darned. It's what's new and popular that > matters; nevermind the ideas, eschew the mean old curmudgeon. The > attitude speaks for itself. Come on man, we're not in for this kind of discussion over here. Do you think that the kind of 'purity' you are talking about is known only to you. If I really were really a dullard that you're assuming me to be, I wouldn't be making fun of myself over here by talking about MS word as the html generator. I'm talking about the effect that happened. It could happened at some other 'pure' setting as well. My point is that there ARE and there could be such issues, and we need something to deal with it. It was obviously not a 'tell me if this is the best way to do it' query that I'll post on the css mailing list. I'm not a 'jQuery atheist something' like you, who is out to wage a war against jQuery, so why would you assume that I'll listen to your advice. Its nice to be a critic, but you're trying to dictate what I should be doing and thinking. And anyways, this is no place for criticism over best practices, attitude and stuff. If you think my ideas don't look right to you. Please ignore them or come up with a debatable opinion on the matter. I can really live without the 'best practices and gotcha' classes over here. The last thing I would want is to engage in a war of words on a w3c mailing list. So please ignore.
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 00:36:02 UTC