- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:16:28 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 9/19/12 9:16 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: >> sorry, i meant to remove item(index); but this brings up the question of >> whether enumeration of properties, e.g., via "for (propertyName in >> rule.descriptors)" is sufficient or not > > What use cases are we trying to support? > > "for .. in" enumeration will enumerate all sorts of stuff in addition to the > descriptor names... You can use hasOwnProperty to fix that. for-of loops fix it for you automatically, and they've been approved for Harmony for some time. So, yes, I think enumeration of properties is sufficient, unless we can establish any good use-cases for something more complicated. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 14:17:19 UTC