- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:57:33 +0800
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
(12/09/09 20:37), Brian Kardell wrote: > On Sep 9, 2012 8:30 AM, "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com> > wrote: >> (12/09/07 21:23), Brian Kardell wrote: >>> On Sep 7, 2012 8:24 AM, "François REMY" <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> >>> wrote: >>> ....[snip] because the point is that we almost all agree, except >>> Tab, that it should not be using the 'var' prefix because custom >>> properties are not variables. >>> >>> You agree, I agree, several people we have talked to, comments on >>> twitter and blog and our own poll agree on that point. >> >> Mind sharing a link to your poll? >> > The original poll was with an article introducing custom properties > verbiage and our alternate fork of the draft > http://briankardell.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/properties-the-new-variables/ > > However... that probably isn't the poll or polls we are looking for > here. I only see four comments and one of which is from François. Am I missing something? (12/09/09 20:37), Brian Kardell wrote: > On Sep 9, 2012 8:30 AM, "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com> wrote: >> Yes, very true. So... why don't you go ahead and create a poll? I just >> can't imagine anyone but you guys to start one. I don't believe the >> working group would be able to represent all Web authors in general. >> However, I am sorry but I have to say that I don't care about this issue >> to the point that I'll create a poll myself... >> > If we can agree on what it should or shouldn't contain and a bunch of > people would be willing to do what they can to throw eyeballs at it, I > would think anyone would be happy to set it up...I would. I disagree that anyone would be happy to set it up because I wouldn't ;). It seems that folks in this thread are more happy brainstorming little reasons why some prefixes are bad or good, and well, I am just quite tired of them. > I think it would be important to list a few options and optionally a > short, unbiased argument for each...though maybe the later can happen > in the comments. Sure. Then why don't you just do it (open a wiki page and such)? I don't think there's any harm in having multiple polls for this matter anyway and I don't think the working group would be able to pick a date of a poll and say this is the one and only one poll on which the decision will be based. Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2012 12:58:05 UTC