- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 08:37:56 -0400
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Cc: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADC=+jfY1bOczhy-FAWFXKAP6-bTa3gF3G9Xn4wcyormEZSwEA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sep 9, 2012 8:30 AM, "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com> wrote: > > (12/09/07 21:23), Brian Kardell wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2012 8:24 AM, "François REMY" <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > >> > > ....[snip] because the point is that we almost all agree, except Tab, that > > it should not be using the 'var' prefix because custom properties are not > > variables. > > > > You agree, I agree, several people we have talked to, comments on twitter > > and blog and our own poll agree on that point. > > Mind sharing a link to your poll? > The original poll was with an article introducing custom properties verbiage and our alternate fork of the draft http://briankardell.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/properties-the-new-variables/ However... that probably isn't the poll or polls we are looking for here. > > Tab says he has contrary data once the verbiage itself is changed and > > things are explained as custom properties. I think that unlike most > > things, it is very possible to create a way to neutrally assess which > > of those is more accurate. Might as well add a few options and just > > see what people find intuitve. I seriously don't see the harm and it > > would end the debate about who is speaking for who, which is > > otherwise bound to go nowhere. > > Yes, very true. So... why don't you go ahead and create a poll? I just > can't imagine anyone but you guys to start one. I don't believe the > working group would be able to represent all Web authors in general. > However, I am sorry but I have to say that I don't care about this issue > to the point that I'll create a poll myself... > > If we can agree on what it should or shouldn't contain and a bunch of people would be willing to do what they can to throw eyeballs at it, I would think anyone would be happy to set it up...I would. I think it would be important to list a few options and optionally a short, unbiased argument for each...though maybe the later can happen in the comments. > Cheers, > Kenny > -- > Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing > Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2012 12:38:25 UTC