Re: [mediaqueries] Doesn't the spec contains an inexistent token in syntax definition? from Florian Rivoal on 2012-10-30 (www-style@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:58:04 +0100
To: "Kenneth Rohde Christiansen" <kenneth.r.christiansen@intel.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.wm0e62u0f5de51@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:56:46 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

>> When rewriting the grammar, please consider making "not (media-feature)"
>> valid.
>
> Yes, this has been brought up before.  I think we agreed to do so?  If
> we didn't get explicit agreement, we at least have a general consensus
> that it would be probably be useful, I think.

I'm in favor of this, with the usual caveats about having to be careful  
not to break the web. We should schedule this to a telconf sometimes soon.

  - Florian

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 20:55:34 UTC