Re: [mediaqueries] Doesn't the spec contains an inexistent token in syntax definition? from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-10-30 (www-style@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:56:46 +0100
To: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.r.christiansen@intel.com>
Cc: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDzbGoQuppAY5aafkRg9qwHGM6CLCj4yOQ9wZZ7G6sCfQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
<kenneth.r.christiansen@intel.com> wrote:
> So this means that calc() should work in media queries? If so we can
> probably look at that for WebKit.

Yes.  In fact, we *explicitly amend* the Appendix G grammar in the V&U
spec, to include calc():
<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/#calc-syntax> (the term
production, which is used in the expr production).

> When rewriting the grammar, please consider making "not (media-feature)"
> valid.

Yes, this has been brought up before.  I think we agreed to do so?  If
we didn't get explicit agreement, we at least have a general consensus
that it would be probably be useful, I think.

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 17:57:33 UTC