- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:25:52 -0700
- To: Tom Potts <karaken12@gmail.com>
- Cc: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Tom Potts <karaken12@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very interesting, François. I've been thinking about something similar, but
> I wasn't able to come up with a working algorithm. Am I right in thinking
> that this only solves problems where backup values are defined? Or are you
> suggesting that
> el {
> my-property-a: no-b;
> my-property-a: get(my-property-b);
> my-property-b: get(my-property-a);
> }
> would also resolve to "no-b" for both properties?
No, the first property gets dropped there as soon as you see the
second, so you're guaranteed to see a cyclic reference there.
~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 15:26:44 UTC