On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Tom Potts <karaken12@gmail.com> wrote: > Very interesting, François. I've been thinking about something similar, but > I wasn't able to come up with a working algorithm. Am I right in thinking > that this only solves problems where backup values are defined? Or are you > suggesting that > el { > my-property-a: no-b; > my-property-a: get(my-property-b); > my-property-b: get(my-property-a); > } > would also resolve to "no-b" for both properties? No, the first property gets dropped there as soon as you see the second, so you're guaranteed to see a cyclic reference there. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 15:26:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:22 UTC