- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:33:11 +0200
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Simon Sapin: > > This would make the pseudo-algorithm simpler. Simpler is generally > > better. But if we just move complexity to somewhere else (in time or > > space), we may noe gain much. If we remove lines 03-10 and replace > > 'available-width' with 'used-width', the input to the pseudo-algorithm > > would change: 'used-width' would have to be known. What should the > > spec say about finding it -- just point to shrink-to-fit in 2.1? > > I think that CSS 2.1 does a pretty good job at separating how a box > behave "on the inside" and "on the outside". So, what is your suggested wording for 'used-width' to go here: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/#pseudo-algorithm -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 22:12:05 UTC