- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:04 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 10/10/2012 01:58, Glenn Adams a écrit : > it would seem a bit easier to not have to admit < \\, NUL > for > implementation reasons; there is really no loss of functionality if this > is not supported, since if the author really wants a NUL, then can just > use < \\, 0, SPACE > or perhaps < \\, 0 > if the context permits. What would exactly mean to "not admit" a sequence of codepoints? Abort completely the tokenizer and throw away the rest of the stylesheet, have the usual error-recovery, or maybe something else? -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 07:37:35 UTC