On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>wrote: > [Glenn Adams:] > > > I don't think I expressed a preference. > > I inferred this from your statement: "I would have preferred to see NULL > excluded from escaping". Or was that just derived from the codebase you > intend to patch? > ah, right, my review of my prior mail failed to see that sentence... yes, it was primarily based on the codebase i was reviewing)... it would seem a bit easier to not have to admit < \\, NUL > for implementation reasons; there is really no loss of functionality if this is not supported, since if the author really wants a NUL, then can just use < \\, 0, SPACE > or perhaps < \\, 0 > if the context permits.
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 23:59:14 UTC