- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:21:41 -0800
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Like others, I feel strongly that *that* kind of zoom should affect >> dPR and d-p-r. (Perhaps we should call it "rescale", to separate it >> from the related-only-thematically "zoom" operation that mobile >> devices do?) >> >> I suspect that Simon's statements are about "zoom", not "rescale", and >> that he (and Apple in general) are fine with rescaling affecting dPR. >> >> In any case, it appears that FF and IE both change dPR when you >> "rescale", so that's the behavior we should go with. > > Great. Can you check that Chrome does the right thing? We don't want compat > problems to arise here, and we've already seen some pages that are making > some questionable assumptions. As far as I can tell, we do the wrong thing. When I Ctrl-+ my way to maximum "zoom" (really "rescale", I think) on my desktop (such that <body> reports its width as being 272px wide instead of 1424px), window.dPR still returns 1. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 01:22:28 UTC