W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2012

Re: The CSS Problem

From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:44:27 +0800
Message-ID: <50A2CD4B.5000506@oupeng.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>, "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
(12/11/14 6:25), Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> [Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu:]
>> It can be argued that if CSSWG had accepted fewer drafts then IE folks
>> might have spent more time on css-flex-1 so that css-flex-1 could have
>> gone to LC before the code freeze. Or you tell me why that wasn't
>> possible.
> Can we stop speculating on why MSFT did or didn't do X? Why is that
> relevant here? 

No, that's somewhat not relevant. I apologize. I only found it easier to
analyze Jens' proposal, which was

(12/11/13 10:46), Jens O. Meiert wrote:
>> You don't suggest an alternative.
> I believe I do, by suggesting a different focus on the Working Group
> side (what is critical, and hence, implied, what can be removed?), and
> also more focus on the community side (how can we get the most out of
> CSS without constantly screaming “more, more”?).

with concrete examples so we don't focus on abstract debates about "does
CSS have enough properties?" In particular, I think it is a good idea if
the Web developers community starts playing Flex and analyze/report
performance problems instead of showing off some of the half-baked
implementations of other modules.

The former part of the proposal "suggesting a different focus on the
Working Group side (what is critical, and hence, implied, what can be
removed?)" hasn't got a feedback though. If the group is confident
enough to say "No, removing drafts from the group isn't helpful at all"
then it could explain.

Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:44:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:21 UTC