- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:33:50 -0800
- To: Philippe Verdy <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > No because fragments in HTML pages have a very different meaning, they are > definitely not media fragments as defined in the MF specs, they are > identifiers found in the parsed HTML content and used through the DOM API. > > The MF specs and HTML spaces are immediately incompatible without an > adaptation layer that transforms an HTML content into a media (image or > video to provide it *additional* 2D positional properties with a document > container). But both use a base <url> and generate their own set of > "fragment" identifiers. Or HTML defining that fragments of the form that MF uses are Media Fragments, not ID frags. This is what SVG is doing, for example. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:34:38 UTC