- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 20:35:23 +0200
- To: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Because we want our code to be understandable. You know that 'bp' means background-position in your code, but I don't. And I (or anybody else) will have to work with your CSS files after you. Also, you may have set 'bp' to be background position, but I may have another file where 'bp' is set to border-padding. How do we fix that mess? -----Message d'origine----- From: Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:16 PM To: Tab Atkins Jr. Cc: Daniel Glazman ; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css-variables] status ? It's a shame. Actually _each_ property could be shortened, especially non-shorthand ones, e.g.: background-position => $bp font-family => $ff line-height => $lh word-wrap => $wr Why not just expand CSS variables to use them anywhere? Or at least not just in property values, but in property names too? What are exact issues with it (if any)? Why hardly limit the feature (variables in this case) immediately as fast as it's invented? Thanks.
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 18:35:53 UTC