On 30/04/2012 8:45 AM, François REMY wrote: > Hi, > > I know this is a controversial subject, but I have got an idea I wanted > to share. I therefore invite you to read the mail even if you actually > like vendor prefixes. I'm trying not to hurt anyone with this mail, I > promise. > > Vendor prefixes have advantages: > > - properties are out quickly, devs can use them if they really need it > (+they can report bugs). > - we can still change the property before standardization, no content is > broken (at least, in theory). [snip] > Kindly regards, > François I mentioned about the benefits of vendor prefixes over a year ago in this message. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0798.html It was regarding this demo. http://css-3d.org/flight-of-the-venturer.htm It seems that I was correct in what I said in April last year (in reference to different rendering of transformed elements across different UAs). To get Firefox 12 correct, I have to feed it different style rules. #inner { /* Reserve for future use. Currently the camera view uses this frame */ -moz-transform: translateX(-100px); /* hack to have it centered for Firefox. Why????? */ } Should I proceed to debug it by ripping apart the demo and creating a test case? -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 16:06:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:16 UTC