W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Vendor-prefixes: an idea

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 02:06:20 +1000
Message-ID: <4FAD38FC.6070800@css-class.com>
To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
CC: CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>
On 30/04/2012 8:45 AM, François REMY wrote:
> Hi,
> I know this is a controversial subject, but I have got an idea I wanted
> to share. I therefore invite you to read the mail even if you actually
> like vendor prefixes. I'm trying not to hurt anyone with this mail, I
> promise.
> Vendor prefixes have advantages:
> - properties are out quickly, devs can use them if they really need it
> (+they can report bugs).
> - we can still change the property before standardization, no content is
> broken (at least, in theory).
> Kindly regards,
> François

I mentioned about the benefits of vendor prefixes over a year ago in 
this message.


It was regarding this demo.


It seems that I was correct in what I said in April last year (in 
reference to different rendering of transformed elements across 
different UAs). To get Firefox 12 correct, I have to feed it different 
style rules.

#inner {
  /* Reserve for future use. Currently the camera view uses this frame */
  -moz-transform: translateX(-100px); /* hack to have it centered for 
Firefox. Why????? */

Should I proceed to debug it by ripping apart the demo and creating a 
test case?

Alan Gresley
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 16:06:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:16 UTC