- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:04:23 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/04/2012 11:28 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (12/05/04 21:34), Florian Rivoal wrote: >> As the spec says, the preferred value of text-emphasis-position is >> language dependent ('above right' for Japanese, 'below right' for >> Chinese). >> >> Because of that, I think we should also accept 'auto', and use it as >> the default value. When the language is not known, it would do the >> same as the current default ('above right'), but if the language is >> known, it would switch to the appropriate behavior. >> >> What do you think? > > This was previously a complex matrix[1] where there's even differences > between Simplified Chinese ('below right') and Traditional Chinese > ('above right'). Given that encoding this logic into a CSS value is a > pain, I think keeping the current initial value as it is is better. And > we can debate this at the default UA style sheet level if we want. > > My personal opinion is that we probably shouldn't have this difference > in the default UA style sheet either. Chinese authors don't use emphasis > dots as much as Japanese authors, and I haven't seen a Chinese book with > emphasis dots for a while. On the other hand, you see quite a lot of > emphasis dots in Japanese manga. I agree with Kenny on this point: the initial value should just be 'above right'. I don't have much of an opinion on the UA stylesheet part, but that's an informative appendix for a reason. > The remaining question is whether we should make authors who prefer > underlining emphasis dots happy by making 'text-emphasis-position' part > of the 'text-emphasis' shorthand. I have no strong opinion about this at > the moment. text-emphasis-position, like text-underline-position, should *not* be reset by the shorthand, and it is designed to inherit independently very intentionally. Authors should be able to set this once on the root element (or set it using [lang] selectors) and let that take care of the position: if the shorthand resets it, then the author has to explicitly reset it correctly *every time* they set an underline or emphasis mark on an element. I'm rejecting both comments as No Change. Let me know if you disagree. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 23:50:40 UTC