- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:42:11 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 05/02/2012 09:44 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:26 AM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Right now for multi-line row flexboxes the spec says >>... >> But it should be fragmentable at the very least when placed at the top of the page, >> and there's imo no reason forced breaks within items should be ignored. > > I tried, but it ended up being weird, as a fragment might move to a > narrow page and be forced to overflow, while the subsequent whole > lines don't. You already have that consideration for single line flexbox. Why should a single-line multiline flexbox behave any different? ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 04:42:42 UTC