W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2012

RE: [css3-transitions] rule for interpolating 'font-weight'

From: Cyril Concolato <Cyril.Concolato@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:19:13 +0000
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <54EF1DA3171CEE48AD59D7FF0DE043C35A5DDE83@exm02-wvp.cisra.canon.com.au>
Hi David,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. David Baron [mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 6:35 AM
> To: www-style@w3.org
> Subject: [css3-transitions] rule for interpolating 'font-weight'
> When we were discussing the rule for interpolating 'font-weight'
> during the March 7 telecon
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0195.html and in my
> list of issues http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1083.html I
> kept referring to the rule for rounding font-weight as rounding to the nearest
> integer.
> However, the rule for animating integers specifies using floor().  I tend to think
> font-weight should probably be consistent with this, and thus round down to the
> nearest lower-or-equal multiple of 100.
> I plan to specify this instead of round-to-nearest.
> Does that sound ok?
Yes, that seems to better match the SVG/SMIL animation behaviour. See Brian's email on the topic:


The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 22:20:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:13 UTC