- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:38:44 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:35 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > When we were discussing the rule for interpolating 'font-weight' > during the March 7 telecon > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0195.html and > in my list of issues > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1083.html I > kept referring to the rule for rounding font-weight as rounding to > the nearest integer. > > However, the rule for animating integers specifies using floor(). I > tend to think font-weight should probably be consistent with this, > and thus round down to the nearest lower-or-equal multiple of 100. > > I plan to specify this instead of round-to-nearest. > > Does that sound ok? Note the SVGWG raised an issue with us about this rounding behavior, because SVG transitions do round-to-nearest. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 20:39:32 UTC