On 03/09/2012 02:36 AM, Leif Arne Storset wrote: > > The point of aliasing is not related to what was published. Rather, what's important is what was implemented. > > Having said that, it is really HP that has to speak up if this aliasing is to be kept. If their printers or drivers don't need > this for backward compat, we should just drop it. The CSSWG discussed this issue today and resolved to shift the aliasing definition from CSS3 Images to the CSS Print Profile. The minutes are available here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0504.html Please let me know if you find this acceptable. ~fantasaiReceived on Thursday, 22 March 2012 03:36:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:12 UTC