- From: Schalk Neethling <sneethling@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Mounir, I believe what Stefan wants is to style fields that are empty, but not necessarily required, different so input:required:invalid is not going to work in this situation. Regards, Schalk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mounir Lamouri" <mounir@lamouri.fr> To: www-style@w3.org Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:37:19 PM Subject: Re: [selectors4] :empty psuedo class and input fields On 03/12/2012 11:03 AM, Stefan Wallin wrote: > This strikes a chord with me, I'd really like to see the possibility to > style input fields that do not fit to be classed as required but are > still empty to be styled differently. Today this has to be done with DOM > scripting, neither input[value=""] or input:empty works as I think it > should work. This use case can already be solved like this: input:required:invalid { } Assuming you are using the required attribute as specified in HTML. Regarding the general proposal. That might be useful assuming there are use cases different from the one above. -- Mounir
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 14:43:55 UTC