- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:39:20 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>, "WWW Style" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:01:35 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Based on this discussion, I've made a few tweaks to the wording. I'm > using the term "uniformly-scaled" in a few places, and better define > the actual rendering of the gradient with the following paragraph: > > """ > The color of the gradient at any point is determined by first finding > the unique ellipse passing through that point with the same center and > ratio between major and minor axises as the ending-shape. The point's > color is then the color of the gradient ray at the point where this > ellipse intersects it. > """ > > Does this sound all right? I think this has the same issue as the other paragraph used to have. It could be resolved by something like s/center/center, orientation/, or by somehow saying "the unique ellipse <among those mentioned earlier> passing through that point", though I can't think of a neat way of phrasing that. I'll try to stop with the fussiness now... except for a language nitpick: I'm pretty sure it's "axes", not "axises" (since we're not talking about the deer here). -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 16:40:08 UTC