- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:30:25 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 06/16/2012 05:48 AM, Anton Prowse wrote: > On 22/05/2012 04:40, L. David Baron wrote: >> On Monday 2012-05-21 16:51 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >>> I was just writing the note about computed value comparison for the >>> toggle() function in V&U and wanted to use box-shadow as an example, >>> but I realized the computed-value line for it doesn't actually support >>> what I'm trying to say. > [...] >>> This is just an editorial oversight, and can be easily corrected. >>> I've also taken the opportunity to review the other properties in the >>> draft, and have similar corrections for a few. > [...] >>> box-shadow: "a list of shadows, each with two offsets, a blur, a >>> spread, and a color, with any<length> made absolute and all colors >>> computed" >> >> box-shadow needs to mention the optional 'inset'. >> >> Other than that, looks good, other than not saying what happens if a >> url() can't be made absolute, which is an issue in 2.1 as well >> unless I've forgotten about something that says what to do. > > Hi David, > > 6.1.1 says: > > # The computed value of URIs that the UA cannot resolve to absolute > # URIs is the specified value. > > Does this address your concern? I've now added this to CSS3 Values and Units, it was missing from there... ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 23:30:58 UTC