- From: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:33:10 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org
(2012/06/20 6:35), L. David Baron wrote: > I propose replacing the text: > ... > > with: > > # If the value for ‘animation-fill-mode’ is ‘backwards’, then the > # animation will apply the property values defined in the keyframe > # that will start the first iteration of the animation, during the > # period defined by ‘animation-delay’. These are either the > # values of the ‘from’ keyframe (when ‘animation-direction’ is > # ‘normal’ or ‘alternate’) or those of the ‘to’ keyframe (when > # ‘animation-direction’ is ‘reverse’ or ‘alternate-reverse’). > # > # If the value for ‘animation-fill-mode’ is ‘forwards’, then after > # the animation ends (as determined by its > # ‘animation-iteration-count’), the animation will apply the > # property values for the time the animation ended. When > # ‘animation-iteration-count’ is an integer greater than zero, the > # values applied will be those for the end of the last completed > # iteration of the animation (rather than the values for the start > # of the iteration that would be next). When > # ‘animation-iteration-count’ is zero, the values applied will be > # those that would start the first iteration (just as when > # ‘animation-fill-mode’ is ‘backwards’). > > Does this seem reasonable? Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 23:33:44 UTC