- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:48:42 +0200
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On 22/05/2012 04:40, L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2012-05-21 16:51 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> I was just writing the note about computed value comparison for the >> toggle() function in V&U and wanted to use box-shadow as an example, >> but I realized the computed-value line for it doesn't actually support >> what I'm trying to say. [...] >> This is just an editorial oversight, and can be easily corrected. >> I've also taken the opportunity to review the other properties in the >> draft, and have similar corrections for a few. [...] >> box-shadow: "a list of shadows, each with two offsets, a blur, a >> spread, and a color, with any<length> made absolute and all colors >> computed" > > box-shadow needs to mention the optional 'inset'. > > Other than that, looks good, other than not saying what happens if a > url() can't be made absolute, which is an issue in 2.1 as well > unless I've forgotten about something that says what to do. Hi David, 6.1.1 says: # The computed value of URIs that the UA cannot resolve to absolute # URIs is the specified value. Does this address your concern? Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 12:49:08 UTC