- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:01:44 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
On 11/05/2012 16:44, Simon Sapin wrote: > I can’t find anything in the spec on tables with 'position: absolute'. > In particular, there are two different algorithms that could apply to > determine their width: > > 10.3.7 Absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements > 17.5.2 Table width algorithms: the 'table-layout' property (and > sub-sections) > > I think that a reasonable way to resolve the conflict is to take the > used width (the result) from 10.3.7 and pretend it is the computed width > (one of the "input") for the purpose of 17.5.2, and keep *that* used value. Simon, I've filed this at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17513 (Note that the same issue applies to other layout models such as flexbox.) Cheers, Anton
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 13:02:09 UTC