- From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:56:36 +0300
- To: "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> wrote: > Sounds good to me. Let's try to determine if what Gecko intends "all" to > mean is the same as what we had in mind for "atomic." Like I said above, > "atomic" causes either all of none of the element to be contained in the > selection. This should happen regardless of how the user performed the > selection action (unlike the observed Gecko behavior for "all" that > Alice identified on webkit-dev). I later saw Ehsan say that that isn't what "all" is meant to do at all. MDN describes it as "In an HTML editor, if a double-click or context-click occurred in sub-elements, the highest ancestor with this value will be selected." <https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-user-select> So a new "atomic" value might be needed. What are the use-cases for user-select: auto?
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 07:57:29 UTC