W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [css3-transforms] interpolation of transform lists

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:47:08 -0700
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5C30D407-71F7-459D-BF04-DDF48DA62951@adobe.com>

On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:51 PM, L. David Baron wrote:

> On Thursday 2012-07-19 16:54 -0700, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> Do I understand your point correctly, that you just want the
>> affected transformation functions to get interpolated as matrices?
> Yes, rather than forcing the entire list to be interpolated as a
> single matrix.
I am not opposed to this proposal. It seems to be different then the behavior on WebKit.

Does Gecko always decide between two transformation functions of two different lists?

scale()	translate()	rotate()
scale()	matrix()		rotate()

would first and last function couples be animated numerically?

scale()	translate()	rotate()
rotate()	matrix()		rotate()

Would the last function couple be animated numerically?

scale()	translate()	rotate()
scale()	translate()

I assume that the first two transform functions would be animated numerically. What happens with the last one? Or do transform function lists must have same number of functions as specified?


> -David
> -- 
> 𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> 𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂

Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 16:47:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:19 UTC