- From: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:53:53 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> writes: > On 06/28/2012 05:00 AM, Morten Stenshorne wrote: >> Should flex items be treated as if they sort of establish a new stacking >> context (except for descendants that are positioned or create true >> stacking contexts on their own)? I'm talking about what >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/zindex.html has to say about inline-block, >> inline-table and floats. > > Hi Morten, > > The CSSWG couldn't think of a good reason to make flex items > establish pseudo-stacking contexts, so we have resolved to > treat them the same way as block and table cell elements. > Please let us know if this is satisfactory, or if you have > further information for us to consider. :) I'm fine with this. I just wanted a clarification. Thanks! -- ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- ---- Office: +47 23692400 ------ Mobile: +47 93440112 ---- ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 05:58:06 UTC