- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:01:03 +0800
- To: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Some nit picking while I am trying to understand these keywords. # min-content # # Called the preferred minimum width in CSS2.1§10.3.5 and the # minimum content width in CSS2.1§5.2.2. s/5.2.2/17.5.2.2/ and ditto for 'max-content'. # For the layout models in CSS2.1, both the min-content extent and # max-content extent of non-replaced elements are defined as the # content extent as defined (for horizontal writing modes) in # CSS2.1§10.6.3 and CSS2.1§17.5.3 for elements with ‘height: # auto’. Does this mean using 'width: min-content' and 'width: max-content' respectively? Can this be clarified a bit? Also, it would be better if this is part of the definition of the keywords 'min-content'/'max-content', I think. # For replaced elements, the min-content and max-content sizes are # the same and correspond used size of the replaced element according # to the ‘auto’ width and height calculations. s/correspond/corresponding to/ ? Intrinsic Sizes in Multi-column Layout # The min-content and max-content sizes of a multi-column element are # undefined per [CSS3COL]. I think this is significantly confusing because you later define 'min-content'/'max-content' using the min/max-content measure of the element's *contents*. My suggestion, if I understand the intention correctly: | The behavior when 'min-content'/'max-content'/'fit-content' is | specified on 'width' or 'height' of a multi-column element is | undefined. Or otherwise, what exactly is this paragraph trying to say? # New Values:‘min-content’|‘max-content’|‘fill-available’... These should link to the <dt>s below instead of above. Cheers, Kenny
Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 16:01:32 UTC