- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:07:01 +0000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
[Glenn Adams:] >Even Unicode has traditionally avoided defining these orderings in the past >due to controversy and lack of common agreement. Are there orderings Unicode has defined? Normatively referencing those orderings for which there is consensus seems reasonable - and I assume there are some that are not controversial - but do we know which are agreed? Also, even though there may not be agreement on one particular ordering, are all the options equally controversial? Even if we must make some list orderings informative shouldn't we try to suggest one so browsers may at least agree on something interoperable that will be useful some of the time vs. instruct everyone to each pick a winner in their own corner?
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 15:07:47 UTC