- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:52:03 -0700
- To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: >> > In the following example, you would want bar to wrap. Instead, the >> > min-height: min-content on the flex-item gets 40px and it doesn't wrap >> > (right?). This seems like not the behavior we want. The content >> > overflows >> > now where it doesn't need to. >> > >> > <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 30px"> >> > <div> >> > <div style="writing-mode:vertical-lr;"> >> > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px;">foo</div> >> > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px">bar</div> >> > </div> >> > </div> >> > </div> >> > >> > Not sure if the problem here is defaulting to min-content on column flex >> > items or if the problem is with the definition of min-content. The >> > following >> > case doesn't really do what you want either: >> > >> > <div style="min-height: min-content"> >> > <div style="writing-mode:vertical-lr;"> >> > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px;">foo</div> >> > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px">bar</div> >> > </div> >> > </div> >> > >> > I don't have a good idea of how to fix this though. >> >> Yes, it's a more general problem, but I'm not sure its generally >> fixable. In many situations you do *not* want "height: min-content;" >> to mean "squish down your height as much as possible". > > What's an example? Take your second example, except fill it with a decent paragraph worth of text instead of two small inline-blocks. Now, the minimum height is achieved by taking every linebreak and making it ridiculously wide. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 20:52:50 UTC