- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:27:54 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANMdWTtzEsZ3KB9vrnnr12bz3E18RH+tUrWaDK9FdLFGHCWT2w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > > In the following example, you would want bar to wrap. Instead, the > > min-height: min-content on the flex-item gets 40px and it doesn't wrap > > (right?). This seems like not the behavior we want. The content overflows > > now where it doesn't need to. > > > > <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 30px"> > > <div> > > <div style="writing-mode:vertical-lr;"> > > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px;">foo</div> > > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px">bar</div> > > </div> > > </div> > > </div> > > > > Not sure if the problem here is defaulting to min-content on column flex > > items or if the problem is with the definition of min-content. The > following > > case doesn't really do what you want either: > > > > <div style="min-height: min-content"> > > <div style="writing-mode:vertical-lr;"> > > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px;">foo</div> > > <div style="display:inline-block; height: 20px">bar</div> > > </div> > > </div> > > > > I don't have a good idea of how to fix this though. > > Yes, it's a more general problem, but I'm not sure its generally > fixable. In many situations you do *not* want "height: min-content;" > to mean "squish down your height as much as possible". > What's an example?
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 20:28:41 UTC