- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:29:23 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/03/2012 02:20 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
>
> div {
> display: flex;
> width: 50%; /* definite */
> flex-flow: column wrap-reverse;
> }
>
> ?
>
> I *think* it's weird in this case if the new flex line stacks up to the
> direction where there's no space (left), but if that's the intention I
> wouldn't say I couldn't live with it (honestly I don't know the use
> cases of 'column wrap-reverse' anyway).
CSS2.1 uses the 'direction' property of the containing block,
not that of the element, to determine the alignment of a
block-level box. Ignoring 'flex-flow' here would be consistent
with that.
So Tab and I propose to reject this change request.
~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 15:29:50 UTC