Koji Ishii wrote: > > Then we should request another UTR50 draft containing the changes > > and use that. I am very strongly against defining something that > > looks like a delta on top of the UTR50 proposal. There is > > absolutely no reason to rush to publish something based on > > preliminary edits that have not necessarily converged to their final > > form. > > First, we resolved to put our own table in the writing-modes spec[1]: > > > - RESOLVED: put our own table of behaviors for mixed-right and upright > > values in the writing-modes spec until UTR50 stabilizes This is an unfortunate paraphrase of what was said. Elika asked if we could make a copy of the UTR data and I said yes. There was some nodding and that was about it. My feeling now is that there's some pushback from folks in Japan so I think it would be best to define the property values 'mixed-right' and 'upright' clearly and simply based on the Unicode properties defined in UTR50. Once those are resolved, we will have a clear normative definition without the need to change/tweak it later because we snapshotted the data too soon. John DaggettReceived on Sunday, 1 July 2012 06:58:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:18 UTC