± From: Daniel Holbert [mailto:dholbert@mozilla.com] ± Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:03 AM ± ± Yup, understood. ± ± (I was just using replaced elements for my example, since their computed ± value for "display" matches that of <span> by default, and that makes it ± tricky to determine "is this a flexbox item" from inside in the style ± system.) (not an issue anymore given your/Alex's suggested spec-update) Good, let’s update the spec. A bit more of explanation that I started typing already... We have observed a major confusion with cases like this (and pretty much every new flexbox user hits this): <flexbox> <img/><img/><img/> <button/><button/><button//> </flexbox> Which would have been a single flexbox item, because img and button are by default inline blocks. Processing floats differently would also lead to confusion: * if floats always wrap, a div with "float:left" is no longer a flex item * if block status before 'float' is used, it's a weird special-case processing model, and it treats float divs and float spans differently... So we have this and we seem to agree it's good)) AlexReceived on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:12:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:10 UTC