- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:02:55 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Yup, understood. (I was just using replaced elements for my example, since their computed value for "display" matches that of <span> by default, and that makes it tricky to determine "is this a flexbox item" from inside in the style system.) (not an issue anymore given your/Alex's suggested spec-update) On 01/25/2012 10:52 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Holbert<dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: >> This is because the definition of >> "flexbox item" involves more than the style tree -- it depends on whether >> the target element is "atomic" (e.g. a replaced element). > > Note that while replaced inlines are "atomic inlines", they're not the > only thing that matches the term. Any element that participates in > inline layout but doesn't let its children do so is an atomic inline, > such as inline-block elements. > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:03:24 UTC