- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:51:46 +0100
- To: Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Le 15/01/2012 18:31, Matthew Wilcox a écrit : > Much like I believe the public facing archive need a serious make-over > (were I capable, I would help out), I think general information > dissemination about how the www-style operates, and roles within it, > could really do with making clear. I would gladly write this up in a > web-page that could get hosted somewhere useful on the W3C - but I don't > know that answers to do that (and nor do I know how to go about it, who > to contact, what the set-up is, etc. That kind of illustrates my point > all on its own). Hi, I think that the closest "official" thing the CSS Working Group currently has is this: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work This page gives a very good overview of the various specs, but the "How to participate" part pretty much stops at "Please join www-style." (This list.) I agree that more public information on how things work would help a lot. On the less official side, I found fantasai’s "about:csswg" series of blog post very interesting: http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/weblog/2011/inside-csswg/ I learned a lot there, even though I was already familiar with the CSSWG. (I had been reading (and implementing) CSS specs and following this list for several months already.) As good as this blog post series is, I see two issues: * It is not as discoverable as, say, the Current Work page. * It is a snapshot at a fixed point in time, and may get out-dated over the years. Fantasai, do you think that the information in there could move somewhere under w3.org where it would be maintained to be kept up-to-date? (Though I understand that *someone* has to do the maintenance work, and people with the time and skill are always lacking...) Regards, -- Simon Sapin
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2012 21:52:56 UTC