W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [CSSWG] Agenda conf call 29-feb-2012

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:44:50 +0100
Message-ID: <4F4DC962.6030500@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Le 28/02/12 22:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :

> If we do, we should broaden it to all non-W3C references, like RFCs,
> which we definitely refer to in some places.

FIWI, RFCs are a bit different here: W3C does not have working groups
on same topics and specs of same names...

</Daniel>

Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 06:45:15 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: fantasai: "Re: [css3-images] CSS element reference identifier"
Previous message: Alan Gresley: "Re: [css3-background] color vs image - final layer"
In reply to: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [CSSWG] Agenda conf call 29-feb-2012"
Next in thread: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [CSSWG] Agenda conf call 29-feb-2012"
Reply: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [CSSWG] Agenda conf call 29-feb-2012"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:12 UTC