Re: [CSSWG] Agenda conf call 29-feb-2012

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Glazman
<daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> Le 28/02/12 22:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>> If we do, we should broaden it to all non-W3C references, like RFCs,
>> which we definitely refer to in some places.
>
> FIWI, RFCs are a bit different here: W3C does not have working groups
> on same topics and specs of same names...

Irrelevant; the concern is with patents, not politics.

~TJ