On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 28/02/12 22:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> If we do, we should broaden it to all non-W3C references, like RFCs, >> which we definitely refer to in some places. > > FIWI, RFCs are a bit different here: W3C does not have working groups > on same topics and specs of same names... Irrelevant; the concern is with patents, not politics. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:47:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:12 UTC