- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:46:38 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 28/02/12 22:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> If we do, we should broaden it to all non-W3C references, like RFCs, >> which we definitely refer to in some places. > > FIWI, RFCs are a bit different here: W3C does not have working groups > on same topics and specs of same names... Irrelevant; the concern is with patents, not politics. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:47:30 UTC